That diversification may and probably should change as time goes on and your ideal investment tolerance shifts.īut you should never just invest in one segment or sector of the market. Because as much as I love recommending REITs, diversification is a must. I could be wrong in that interpretation, and – truth be told – I hope I am.
The impression I got from the ad is that it’s telling you to put all your money into dividend stocks. There are a few other issues I have about what we just read, as described below. So there’s that concern I want to bring up. Or that it’s “living in the moment” like a teenager who just won the lottery.Īnd while 7% yields and 8% yields aren’t as high as REITs can go, they do perhaps require a bit more scrutiny than, say, 4% or 5% yields. Higher yields could mean that a company is trying to hide disconcerting fundamentals. So I can neither confirm nor deny whether its portfolio is filled with truly profitable picks or whether it’s dealing in riskier companies prepping to ply you with so-called sucker yields.Īfter all, as I explained in my recent article detailing seven stocks yielding 7% yields, you need to be careful. To do so, I have to admit that I didn’t subscribe to the newsletter being touted. Apparently, she feels very strongly about this.īut those two presentational issues aside, let’s talk about the actual claims the advertisement makes. She also informed me that it misuses “ironically,” claiming that it’s one of the most misconstrued words in the English language. This, she says, makes it much more cheesy and visually distracting than she’d prefer. Now, according to my amazing editor (thank you for putting in the long hours), the copy in question features far too many suspense-building ellipses.
0 kommentar(er)
